Assessing psychological and supportive care needs in glioma patients - feasibility study on the use of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form (SCNS-SF34-G) and the Supportive Care Needs Survey Screening Tool (SCNS-ST9) in clinical practice.

Neuro-oncological patients experience high symptom and psychosocial burden. The aim was to test feasibility and practicability of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form (SCNS-SF34-G) and the SCNS-Screening Tool (SCNS-ST9) to assess supportive care needs of neuro-oncological patients in clinical routine. A total of 173 patients, most with a primary diagnosis of high-grade glioma (81%), were assessed first using SCNS-SF34-G in comparison to two well-established patient-reported outcome measures, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30 + QLQ-BN20) and Distress Thermometer (DT). In a follow-up assessment, SCNS-ST9 was used in a subgroup (n = 90). Questionnaires were completed either with personal guidance offered (group A) or by patients alone (group B). Feasibility was compared between instruments and groups for possible associations with patient and treatment-related factors. Missing values occurred in similar frequencies in all instruments. Errors in completion occurred in SCNS-SF34-G in 20% and in SCNS-ST9 in 16%; difficulties in completion were observed more often in SCNS-SF34-G and SCNS-ST9 (39%) compared to DT and EORTC (13%, p < .001). Distress was found to be associated with difficulties in completion of SCNS (OR 1.4, [95% CI 1.1-1.9], p = .013). SCNS-SF34 and SCNS-ST9 are suitable tools for glioma patients as long as personal guidance is offered.

Efficacy and safety of durotomy after decompressive hemicraniectomy in traumatic brain injury.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DH) plus duroplasty was demonstrated to be effective for treating critically elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). In order to shorten operation time and to avoid the use of autologous or heterologous material, durotomy has been introduced as an alternative to duroplasty. Only limited data is available on the effect of DH and durotomy on the increased ICP in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Therefore, we collected consecutive intraoperative ICP readings during the different steps of DH and durotomy in TBI patients. Eighteen patients with TBI and uncontrollable ICP increase (measured by either an intraparenchymal or an intraventricular ICP probe) underwent DH and durotomy. ICP readings as well as mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and arterial PCO2 were obtained during defined stages of the operation. Surgical complications of the durotomy itself and of cranioplasty after 3 months were recorded. The outcome was assessed prior to cranioplasty using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). ICP dropped significantly during surgery from a mean of 41 ( ± 16.2) mmHg at the beginning to a mean of 11.8 ( ± 7.5) mmHg at the end (p ≤ 0.001). A first significant ICP-decrease to a mean of 18 ( ± 10.8) mmHg (p ≤ 0.001) was detected after removal of the bone flap, and a second significant ICP-decrease to a mean of 10.6 ( ± 5.3) mmHg (p < 0.001) during durotomy. The mean operation time was 115.3 min ( ± 49.6). Five patients (28%) died; seven patients (39%) had a good outcome (GOS 5). There were no relevant complications associated to durotomy. Durotomy after DH is a safe and straightforward procedure, which significantly lowers critically increased ICP in patients with TBI. Although no graft is used, dural preparation for cranioplasty at 3 months is easily possible.

[Patient-centered care. Improvement of communication between university medical centers and general practitioners for patients in neuro-oncology]. / Patientenzentrierte Versorgung. Verbesserung der Kommunikation zwischen Universitätsklinik und Hausärzten bei neuroonkologischen Patienten.

INTRODUCTION: Communication between university medical centers and general practitioners (GP) is becoming increasingly more important in supportive patient care. A survey among GPs was performed with the primary objective to assess their opinion on current workflow and communication between GPs and the university medical center. METHODS: The GPs were asked to score (grades 1-6) their opinion on the current interdisciplinary workflow in the care of patients with brain tumors, thereby rating communication between a university medical center in general and the neuro-oncology outpatient center in particular. RESULTS: Questionnaires were sent to1000 GPs and the response rate was 15 %. The mean scored evaluation of the university medical center in general was 2.62 and of the neuro-oncological outpatient clinic 2.28 (range 1-6). The most often mentioned issues to be improved were easier/early telephone information (44 %) and a constantly available contact person (49 %). Interestingly, > 60 % of the GPs indicated they would support web-based tumor boards for interdisciplinary and palliative neuro-oncological care. CONCLUSION: As interdisciplinary care for neuro-oncology patients is an essential part of therapy, improvement of communication between GPs and university medical centers is indispensable. Integrating currently available electronic platforms under data protection aspects into neuro-oncological palliative care could be an interesting tool in order to establish healthcare networks and could find acceptance with GPs.